Enclosed diffusion flames are commonly found in practical combustion systems, such as the power-plant combustor, gas turbine combustor, and jet engine after-burner. In these systems, fuel is injected into a duct with a co-flowing or cross-flowing air stream. The diffusion flame is found at the surface where the fuel jet and oxygen meet, react, and consume each other. In combustors, this flame is anchored at the burner (i.e., fuel jet inlet) unless adverse conditions cause the flame to lift off or blow out. Investigations of burner stability study the lift off, reattachment, and blow out of the flame. Flame stability is strongly dependent on the fuel jet velocity. When the fuel jet velocity is sufficiently low, the diffusion flame anchors at the burner rim. When the fuel jet velocity is increased, the flame base gradually moves downstream. However, when the fuel jet velocity increases beyond a critical value, the flame base abruptly jumps downstream. When this "jump" occurs, the flame is said to have reached its lift-off condition and the critical fuel jet velocity is called the lift-off velocity. While lifted, the flame is not attached to the burner and it appears to float in mid-air. Flow conditions are such that the flame cannot be maintained at the burner rim despite the presence of both fuel and oxygen. When the fuel jet velocity is further increased, the flame will eventually extinguish at its blowout condition. In contrast, if the fuel jet velocity of a lifted flame is reduced, the flame base moves upstream and abruptly returns to anchor at the burner rim. The fuel jet velocity at reattachment can be much lower than that at lift off, illustrating the hysteresis effect present in flame stability. Although there have been numerous studies of flame stability, the controlling mechanisms are not well understood. This uncertainty is described by Pitts in his review of various competing theories of lift off and blow out in turbulent jet diffusion flames. There has been some research on the stability of laminar flames, but most studies have focused on turbulent flames. It is also well known that the airflow around the fuel jet can significantly alter the lift off, reattachment and blow out of the jet diffusion flame. Buoyant convection is sufficiently strong in 1-g flames that it can dominate the flow-field, even at the burner rim. In normal-gravity testing, it is very difficult to delineate the effects of the forced airflow from those of the buoyancy-induced flow. Comparison of normal-gravity and microgravity flames provides clear indication of the influence of forced and buoyant flows on the flame stability. The overall goal of the Enclosed Laminar Flames (ELF) investigation (STS-87/USMP-4 Space Shuttle mission, November to December 1997) is to improve our understanding of the effects of buoyant convection on the structure and stability of co-flow diffusion flame, e.g., see http://zeta.lerc.nasa.gov/expr/elf.htm. The ELF hardware meets the experiment hardware limit of the 35-liter interior volume of the glovebox working area, and the 180x220-mm dimensions of the main door. The ELF experiment module is a miniature, fan-driven wind tunnel, equipped with a gas supply system. A 1.5-mm diameter nozzle is located on the duct's flow axis. The cross section of the duct is nominally a 76-mm square with rounded corners. The forced air velocity can be varied from about 0.2 to 0.9 m/s. The fuel flow can be set as high as 3 std. cubic centimeter (cc) per second, which corresponds to a nozzle exit velocity of up to 1.70 m/s. The ELF hardware and experimental procedure are discussed in detail in Brooker et al. The 1-g test results are repeated in several experiments following the STS-87 Mission. The ELF study is also relevant to practical systems because the momentum-dominated behavior of turbulent flames can be achieved in laminar flames in microgravity. The specific objectives of this paper are to evaluate the use reduced model for simulation of flame lift-off and blowout.
展开▼
机译:封闭的扩散火焰通常出现在实际的燃烧系统中,例如动力装置的燃烧器,燃气轮机燃烧器和喷气发动机后燃器。在这些系统中,燃料与同流或错流的空气流注入管道中。在燃料射流和氧气相互接触,反应和消耗的表面发现了扩散火焰。在燃烧器中,除非不利条件导致火焰升起或喷出,否则火焰会固定在燃烧器(即喷油嘴)上。对燃烧器稳定性的调查研究了火焰的升起,重新连接和吹灭。火焰稳定性在很大程度上取决于燃油喷射速度。当燃料喷射速度足够低时,扩散火焰固定在燃烧器边缘。当燃料喷射速度增加时,火焰底座逐渐向下游移动。然而,当燃料喷射速度增加到超过临界值时,火焰基突然向下游跳跃。当发生这种“跳跃”时,据说火焰已经达到其脱离状态,并且临界燃料喷射速度称为脱离速度。抬起时,火焰未附着在燃烧器上,似乎漂浮在空中。流动条件使得尽管存在燃料和氧气,火焰也无法保持在燃烧器边缘。当燃料喷射速度进一步提高时,火焰最终将在其喷出条件下熄灭。相反,如果降低火焰的燃料喷射速度,则火焰基部向上游移动并突然返回以锚定在燃烧器边缘。重新安装时的燃料喷射速度可能远低于提起时的速度,说明火焰稳定性中存在滞后效应。尽管已经有许多关于火焰稳定性的研究,但是对控制机理的理解还不够。皮特斯(Pitts)在对湍流喷射扩散火焰中升空和吹灭的各种竞争理论的评论中描述了这种不确定性。对于层流火焰的稳定性已有一些研究,但是大多数研究都集中在湍流火焰上。还众所周知,燃料射流周围的气流会显着改变升力,重新连接和吹出射流扩散火焰。浮力对流在1-g火焰中足够强,即使在燃烧器边缘,它也可以主导流场。在正重力测试中,很难将强迫气流的影响与浮力引起的气流的影响区分开来。正重力和微重力火焰的比较清楚地表明了强制流动和浮力流动对火焰稳定性的影响。封闭层流火焰(ELF)研究(STS-87 / USMP-4航天飞机任务,1997年11月至12月)的总体目标是增进我们对浮力对流对同流扩散的结构和稳定性的影响的了解火焰,例如,参见http://zeta.lerc.nasa.gov/expr/elf.htm。 ELF硬件符合手套箱工作区内部容积为35升,主门尺寸为180x220毫米的实验硬件极限。 ELF实验模块是由风扇驱动的微型风洞,配有供气系统。直径为1.5毫米的喷嘴位于管道的流轴上。管道的横截面标称是带有圆角的76毫米见方。强制空气速度可在约0.2至0.9 m / s之间变化。燃油流量可以设置为3 std。立方厘米(cc)每秒,对应于高达1.70 m / s的喷嘴出口速度。 Brooker等人详细讨论了ELF硬件和实验过程。在执行STS-87任务后,在多个实验中重复了1-g测试结果。 ELF研究也与实际系统相关,因为湍流火焰的动量主导行为可以在微重力下的层流火焰中实现。本文的具体目标是评估使用减少的模型来模拟火焰升起和喷出。
展开▼